Socialists Plot
Where did all the real money go that was lost in the current stock market crash? Some of the economist contend that no money was lost–at least not until the stock is sold! After all, it’s just on paper. Try telling that to the little people who have lost half their retirement nest eggs. I disagree whole-eartily with the economists. Aren’t they the ones who tell the government that it can spend it self out of debt? I took college economics and got a “C” for my efforts, in that the professor and I disagreed on the principles and that I had enough gall to question his socialism.
If the stock market crash is a plot, then the playing field has been leveled a great deal. The wealthy elite are now in the trenches with the others.
A try was made to elevate the “have-nots” by allowing them to buy homes and other things they couldn’t afford. The consequence was the failure of banks, which brought them down to the level of the “have-nots” that the government was trying to elevate.
Now, our new regime has mandated additional taxes on the nation’s wealthy, with a consequent redistribution of weaalth to the “have-nots.”
Additional billions will be funneled into health care for the indigents. The billions will partially come from cuts in medicare, a privilege paid for by hard workers who paid taxes on their earnings to fund old-age benefits. They’ll now lose out to those who paid no taxes for health care and never will.
Viewing the large picture, the government has made the classes equal–not by elevating the downtrodden, but by trampling the others down to their abyss.
We need a free market, free enterprise, and rewards for hard work. Whereas, we presently seem to reward those who do nothing.
Look at our guest workers from south of the border. They work, save their money, send money home, and try to elevate themselves in this land of opportunity.
“The poor will always be with us.” We don’t need to reward them by bringing everyone down to them.
The 2008 election has yet to be decided, but one thing is clear: If the Democrats win the White House, expect an all-out attack on talk radio. Political talk, as we know it, could end.
If they win, Rush, Imus, Savage, Beck, and dozens of other major hosts will be muzzled by using federal regulations to control political talk.
So, what’s their plan of attack?
As Newsmax magazine reveals in its special report, “The Battle for Talk Radio,” leading liberals in Congress, the Democratic presidential candidates, and even some Republicans speak openly of their plans to end conservative talk radio using federal regulations.
Their weapon: a revived Fairness Doctrine, which would once again require stations to air divergent points of view — a clever ruse that makes station owners leery of airing controversial talk-radio hosts fearing law suits and federal sanctions.
This is almost like something I’ve heard about where since the right to bear arms has been confirmed. It’s that a push to ban shells is undereway. I felt that was already going on. When I bought shells at Wal-Mart, I had to sign for them and show ID. The ATU can tell that way who has what caliber firearm.
tomvancel